Gujarat HC Takes Contempt Action Over Toilet Hearing
Thanks for studying this publish, do not forget to subscribe!
A person attended a Gujarat Excessive Court docket listening to from a bathroom, triggering suo motu contempt motion.
The courtroom known as it “disorderly behaviour” and ordered speedy video deletion.
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat Excessive Court docket has began suo motu contempt of courtroom proceedings in opposition to a person who appeared in a digital listening to whereas sitting on a bathroom seat. The surprising incident occurred throughout a listening to on June 20, 2025, earlier than Justice Nirzar S. Desai.
A video clip of the incident quickly went viral on social media, drawing huge public criticism and elevating critical questions on courtroom decorum in digital settings.
A Division Bench of Justices A.S. Supehia and R.T. Vachhani, of their order dated June 30 (which was uploaded on July 3), directed the Excessive Court docket registry to start contempt proceedings in opposition to the person seen within the video.
The courtroom expressed robust disapproval of what it described as
“disorderly and uncontrolled behaviour”.
The Bench additional requested the Registrar of Info and Expertise to discover a approach to cease such acts sooner or later throughout livestreamed courtroom hearings. T
he judges mentioned,
“The notorious video tarnishing the picture of this courtroom is extensively circulated on social media and requires speedy deletion.”
The individual within the video has been recognized as Abdul Samad, a resident of Kim village in Surat district, Gujarat. He had joined the digital courtroom listening to by means of his cell phone whereas sitting on a bathroom seat.
Within the one-minute video, his digicam was dealing with him, and after utilizing the bathroom, he picked up the telephone and walked out.
To make issues worse, he rejoined the courtroom livestream once more later, this time from one other location, carrying earphones and ready for his matter to be heard.
The courtroom has now issued a discover to Abdul Samad, asking him to clarify why he shouldn’t be punished below Part 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The matter can be taken up once more after two weeks.
Apparently, Justice Nirzar Desai, who was presiding over the listening to, didn’t appear to note the sooner misconduct. Mr. Samad was the complainant in an assault case and was represented by legal professionals who knowledgeable the courtroom that each events had come to a compromise.
Mr. Samad had agreed to quash the FIR, and primarily based on this, Justice Desai allowed the plea and closed the matter.
As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, the Gujarat Excessive Court docket, like many different courts in India, allowed litigants and legal professionals to attend hearings just about.
Background Of The Case
The case started when Abdul Samad, a resident of Kim village in Surat, filed a grievance in an assault matter. The case was listed earlier than the Gujarat Excessive Court docket for quashing the First Info Report (FIR), as each events had reportedly reached a settlement.
On June 20, 2025, through the digital listening to performed earlier than Justice Nirzar S. Desai, Mr. Samad joined the web courtroom proceedings from his cell phone whereas sitting on a bathroom seat.
The digicam was turned on and straight confronted him, capturing your entire act. After ending, he exited the washroom and later rejoined the identical listening to from one other location, carrying earphones.
Justice Desai, seemingly unaware of the sooner incident, proceeded with the matter. Mr. Samad’s legal professionals informed the courtroom {that a} compromise had been reached, and Mr. Samad had given his consent to withdraw the grievance. Accordingly, the courtroom allowed the FIR to be quashed.
Nevertheless, a video of Mr. Samad’s inappropriate behaviour through the digital listening to went viral on social media, inflicting public outrage.
Click Here to Read Our Reports on Gujarat High Court
