Delhi High Court Puts Rs 340 Cr Fine On Hold In Beverly Hills Polo Club Vs Amazon Case – Big Win For E-Commerce Giant!
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Right now (July 1) stayed a Rs 340 crore damages order towards Amazon in a trademark case filed by Beverly Hills Polo Membership proprietor Way of life Equities. The keep got here with out Amazon needing to deposit any cash.
Thanks for studying this put up, do not forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: The Delhi Excessive Courtroom’s division bench stayed a earlier single-judge ruling that had directed Amazon Applied sciences to pay $39 million (round Rs 340 crore) to Way of life Equities for trademark infringement. The case concerned misuse of the favored ‘Beverly Hills Polo Membership’ emblem.
The division bench, led by Justices Hari Shankar and Ajay Digpaul, granted an interim keep on the order with out asking Amazon to make any advance cost. A whole copy of the court docket’s order continues to be awaited.
This case began again in 2020, when Way of life Equities filed a lawsuit claiming that Amazon and others had used a related emblem to the “Beverly Hills Polo Membership” model on clothes and different items offered on the Amazon platform.
The corporate particularly stated that Amazon was making and promoting merchandise underneath its “Image” model that used the infringing emblem, and in addition accused Cloudtail India, a significant vendor on Amazon.in, of promoting these unlawful objects.
Earlier, on October 12, 2020, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom gave an interim order stopping Amazon and others from utilizing the emblem and requested Amazon Vendor Providers to take away the infringing merchandise from their web site. Later, Amazon Applied sciences failed to seem in court docket, so the court docket proceeded ex-parte, that means with out their participation.
In the meantime, Cloudtail India admitted it used the mark between 2015 and July 2020, and agreed to just accept a authorized ban (injunction) on additional use. They even proposed a settlement involving damages, however mediation didn’t work out. Cloudtail admitted incomes Rs 23,92,420 from the gross sales and holding round 20% revenue.
Based mostly on this, the court docket awarded damages of Rs 4,78,484 (20% of gross sales) towards Cloudtail and stated that Way of life Equities nonetheless had the correct to hunt damages from Amazon as nicely.
Finally, the Courtroom dominated that Amazon was additionally accountable, not simply Cloudtail, due to its shut industrial ties with Cloudtail. It stated Amazon couldn’t escape legal responsibility simply by claiming to be a platform.
The Courtroom criticized Amazon and others for attempting to appear like separate corporations to keep away from blame, saying they tried to “diffuse and dissipate the implications of infringement.”
The court docket additionally studied the Amazon Model License and Distribution Settlement with Cloudtail and located that Amazon gave Cloudtail full rights to make use of its branding and logos. Due to this settlement, the court docket dominated that Amazon was “instantly accountable” for Cloudtail’s actions.
The settlement granted Cloudtail in depth rights to make use of Amazon’s logos and branding.
These contractual phrases made Amazon instantly accountable for the acts of Cloudtail.
On account of Amazon’s actions, Way of life Equities needed to spend closely on promoting and model safety. The court docket discovered these efforts had been a direct results of the infringement and awarded $5 million as damages for this.
On account of the infringement, Way of life needed to undertake substantial promoting and promotional efforts to guard its model fame.
The Courtroom discovered these expenditures to be a direct and foreseeable consequence of Amazon’s actions.
Additionally, the court docket awarded $33.78 million (Rs 292.7 crore) as compensation for misplaced royalties. Altogether, this introduced the damages to $38.78 million (Rs 336 crore).
Lastly, the court docket added litigation prices and court docket charges, elevating the overall quantity Amazon needed to pay to about Rs 340 crore.
The ruling is a landmark judgment and will affect how e-commerce platforms are held accountable when sellers on their platforms break mental property legal guidelines.
Amazon was represented by Senior Advocates Neeraj Kishan Kaul and Arvind Nigam together with legal professionals from Saikrishna & Associates, together with Saikrishna Rajagopal, Sidharth Chopra, Sneha Jain, Devvrat Joshi, Angad S Makkar, Ira Mahajan, Pritha Suri, and Agnish Aditya.
Way of life Equities CV was represented by Senior Advocates Gaurav Pachnanda, Ankit Jain, and Sai Deepak, with a group from Sim and San, together with Mohit Goel, Sidhant Goel, Deepankar Mishra, Karmanya Dev Sharma, Aditya Goel, Namrata Sinha, and Love Virvani.
Would You Like Assistance In Drafting A Legal Notice Or Complaint?
CLICK HERE
Click Here to Read Our Reports on CJI BR Gavai
Click Here to Read Our Reports on Justice Yashwant Varma
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
