Delhi High Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea To Quash Rs 200 Cr Money Laundering Case
Thanks for studying this submit, do not forget to subscribe!
Jacqueline Fernandez’s petition to cancel ED’s cash laundering case was dismissed by Delhi Excessive Courtroom. The case entails alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar and a Rs 200 crore rip-off.
New delhi: In the present day, on July 3, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom dismissed Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to cancel a cash laundering case filed in opposition to her by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
The case is linked to an alleged Rs 200 crore rip-off involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar.
Jacqueline Fernandez had requested the Courtroom to cancel the Enforcement Case Info Report (ECIR) and the prosecution criticism (which has similarities to a chargesheet) during which she was named as an accused.
The petition was heard by Justice Anish Dayal, who rejected her request. An in depth judgment is but to be made out there.
ALSO READ: PMLA| “1,739 Money Laundering Cases Are Under Trial”: ED Director
The case goes again to claims that Fernandez acquired costly presents from Sukesh Chandrashekhar, who’s accused of pretending to be a high-level officer from the Prime Minister’s Workplace (PMO) and the Residence Ministry to cheat Delhi-based businesswoman Aditi Singh of practically Rs 200 crores over a interval of seven to eight months.
In December 2021, the ED filed its first prosecution criticism in opposition to eight folks, and Jacqueline Fernandez was not a part of that preliminary checklist.
Nonetheless, on August 17, 2022, the ED filed a second supplementary prosecution criticism and formally named Fernandez as an accused. She then challenged this growth in courtroom.
Senior Advocate Siddharth Aggarwal represented Jacqueline Fernandez. He clarified that the actress was not attempting to cancel your complete criticism however solely the half that mentions her.
In response to him, Fernandez had no thought she was receiving presents from a legal, and she or he had all the time cooperated with authorities.
He stated,
“She has not sought quashing of the prosecution criticism in its entirety however solely as far as it pertains to Fernandez,”
He added that Fernandez is definitely a witness within the unique crime investigated by Delhi Police and that Chandrashekhar used related tips on her as he did on Aditi Singh.
ALSO READ: ED Charges AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan in Waqf Board Money Laundering Case
He stated the conman made a spoof name pretending to be a prime authorities official to get in contact with Fernandez’s make-up artist Shaan.
Fernandez claimed she was additionally a sufferer within the rip-off and was fully unaware of the legal background of Sukesh Chandrashekhar and his associates.
She additionally talked about that she had visited the ED workplace 5 instances and recorded her assertion below Part 50 of the Prevention of Cash Laundering Act (PMLA).
On the opposite facet, the Enforcement Directorate was represented by Particular Counsel Zoheb Hossain. He strongly opposed Jacqueline’s plea and questioned whether or not it was even legally maintainable. He argued that the trial courtroom had already taken correct judicial discover of the case.
He stated
“The order of cognisance is a sound order… And not using a problem to the cognisance order, the place such a view is in existence, the problem to the prosecution criticism will not be out there,”
Hossain additionally argued that Jacqueline Fernandez continued to simply accept presents from Sukesh even after studying about his involvement in unlawful actions.
He alleged that the petition to quash the case was solely a method to delay the continuing authorized proceedings.
He argued,
“The petition to quash the case is an try to stall the proceedings,”
Click Here to Read More Reports On Money Laundering
