Advocate Withdraws Consent For Appointment As Delhi High Court Judge After Prolonged Delay
Thanks for studying this publish, remember to subscribe!
Prime IPR lawyer Shwetasree Majumdar pulls out of Delhi Excessive Court docket judgeship after Centre delays appointment with out rationalization. Her identify remained pending whereas others have been cleared.
New Delhi: Advocate Shwetasree Majumdar has taken again her consent for being appointed as a decide of the Delhi Excessive Court docket. This resolution comes after the Central Authorities didn’t act on the advice despatched by the Supreme Court docket Collegium for nearly a 12 months.
The Supreme Court docket Collegium had beneficial the names of three legal professionals — Advocate Shwetasree Majumdar, Advocate Digpaul, and Advocate Shailender Kaur Shankar — for appointment as judges of the Delhi Excessive Court docket. This suggestion was made on August 21, 2023.
ALSO READ: Law Researchers Move Delhi HC Over Salary Hike Delay and Unpaid Arrears Since 2022
Nonetheless, though the appointments of Mr. Digpaul and Mr. Shankar have been permitted by the Centre on January 6, 2025, the federal government didn’t take any resolution on Ms. Majumdar’s identify. No causes got for maintaining her identify pending.
Because of this unexplained delay, Ms. Majumdar has now withdrawn her consent for the judgeship.
Advocate Shwetasree Majumdar is a widely known mental property rights (IPR) lawyer and the managing companion of Fidus Legislation Chambers, a legislation agency she established in 2008.
She is a graduate of the Nationwide Legislation College of India College (NLSIU), Bengaluru, one of many high legislation schools in India.
Ms. Majumdar has argued in over 500 circumstances earlier than varied Excessive Courts and the Supreme Court docket of India. She has additionally served as amicus curiae (an individual appointed by the courtroom to help it) in a number of issues earlier than the Delhi Excessive Court docket.
Aside from her courtroom observe, she has contributed to the authorized framework as a part of a particular six-member committee.
This committee was accountable for drafting the “Delhi Excessive Court docket (Unique Aspect) Guidelines, 2018”.
Though her skilled achievements are extensively recognised, the Central Authorities didn’t present any cause for the lengthy delay in processing her identify for judicial appointment.
ALSO READ: 8th Pay Commission: Full Details On Salary Hike, Pension & Key Changes Ahead
By withdrawing her consent after such an extended wait, Ms. Majumdar’s resolution highlights considerations over the delay and opacity within the judicial appointment course of, particularly when names are saved pending with out rationalization.
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Delhi High Court
