Calcutta HC Slams SSC For Letting Ineligible Candidates Appear In Exams Despite SC Order
Thanks for studying this publish, do not forget to subscribe!
Justice Saugata Bhattacharya questioned why unqualified aspirants are allowed in SSC exams. The court docket demanded solutions over violations of the Supreme Courtroom’s clear directives.
Kolkata: At the moment, on July 1, Justice Saugata Bhattacharya of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom has questioned the West Bengal state authorities relating to the inclusion of ineligible candidates within the ongoing College Service Fee (SSC) recruitment course of, regardless of clear instructions from the Supreme Courtroom.
The matter pertains to the cancellation of 26,000 educating jobs, for which the apex court docket had earlier ordered a recent recruitment course of to be carried out by the SSC.
ALSO READ: SSC Job Scam| “CBI Must Show the Information About Job Sales”: Calcutta HC
As per the Supreme Courtroom’s ruling, solely these candidates who haven’t been declared ineligible up to now ought to be allowed to seem within the recent examination.
Nonetheless, critical considerations have now been raised in court docket in regards to the state’s implementation of this directive.
Justice Saugata Bhattacharya raised doubts in regards to the latest SSC recruitment round issued on Could 30, which introduced the hiring for greater than 40,000 vacant posts. Addressing the state’s authorized counsel, the decide requested: “The round issued by the College Service Fee accommodates a number of questions. Reply them. Inform the court docket why you allowed ineligible candidates to seem for the examination regardless of the Supreme Courtroom’s order.”
The petitioner within the case argued that the SSC’s Could 30 notification didn’t clearly point out whether or not candidates who had already been declared ineligible by the court docket can apply for the brand new examination.
This has brought about confusion amongst real job seekers and led to authorized motion towards the state’s recruitment course of.
Responding to those allegations, the state’s counsel defended the federal government’s actions, stating that every thing has been achieved as per the Supreme Courtroom’s instructions.
Nonetheless, the counsel additionally sought extra time from the Excessive Courtroom to file an in depth response.
The counsel stated,
“Regardless of the state has achieved up to now has been achieved in accordance with the instructions of the Supreme Courtroom,”
One other main level of rivalry raised by the petitioners considerations the analysis standards for the recent recruitment examination.
As per the brand new guidelines, 10 marks have been allotted for prior educating expertise. This has been seen as discriminatory by many recent candidates who wouldn’t have educating expertise, as they’d mechanically be at an obstacle.
“Those that wouldn’t have the expertise of educating will first take part on this competitors by getting lower than 10 marks. They must fall far behind,”
the petitioners acknowledged, arguing that such a provision goes towards the ideas of truthful competitors and equal alternative.
The Excessive Courtroom directed the state and the College Service Fee to file their detailed responses by Monday.
The matter was introduced earlier than the summer time trip bench of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom by a bunch of aggrieved job aspirants and a few presently employed academics who declare to be certified.
Initially, Justice Bhattacharya was hesitant to listen to the matter, provided that associated points are nonetheless being thought-about by the Supreme Courtroom.
Nonetheless, he later agreed to proceed with the case and scheduled a listening to for July 1.
“He later stated he would hear the case on July 1.”
The applying window for the brand new recruitment examination, as per the SSC’s Could 30 notification, will stay open till July 14.
Background of the Case
The case arises from a significant recruitment scandal involving the West Bengal College Service Fee (SSC), the place roughly 26,000 educating and non-teaching jobs have been cancelled following allegations of irregularities and corruption within the appointment course of.
The Supreme Courtroom of India, after reviewing the case, directed that each one affected posts be stuffed by means of a recent, clear recruitment course of.
Importantly, the apex court docket acknowledged that solely these candidates who had not been discovered ineligible within the earlier investigations ought to be permitted to take a seat for the brand new examination.
Following this, on Could 30, 2025, the SSC issued a recent notification to fill over 40,000 vacancies in colleges.
Nonetheless, considerations have been quickly raised by job aspirants and a few certified academics, claiming that the notification failed to obviously point out whether or not ineligible candidates have been barred from making use of. This led to confusion and prompted authorized challenges within the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom.
Justice Saugata Bhattacharya of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom took up the matter, expressing concern over the attainable violation of the Supreme Courtroom’s directive.
The Excessive Courtroom is now analyzing whether or not the state and SSC have allowed disqualified or ineligible candidates to take part within the recent recruitment course of, opposite to the orders issued by the Supreme Courtroom.
Click Here to Read More Reports On SSC
