Delhi HC Orders Patanjali To Remove Advertisements
Thanks for studying this put up, do not forget to subscribe!
At this time, On third July, The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has directed Patanjali to take down ads that allegedly disparage Dabur’s Chyawanprash. This interim order got here in response to a swimsuit filed by Dabur accusing Patanjali of deceptive and detrimental promoting.
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom issued an interim order instructing Patanjali Ayurved to withdraw its disparaging ads concentrating on Dabur’s Chyawanprash merchandise.
Justice Mini Pushkarna delivered the ruling in response to a lawsuit filed by Dabur in opposition to Patanjali, claiming that the latter was selling deceptive ads about its Chyawanprash.
The specifics of the courtroom’s order haven’t but been launched.
The case is now scheduled to be heard by the roster bench on July 14.
The controversy started when Patanjali aired an commercial that includes its founder, Swami Ramdev, who questioned the credibility of different Chyawanprash merchandise accessible out there.
The advert contains the assertion,
“Jinko Ayurved aur Vedo ka gyaan nahi, Charak, Sushrut, Dhanwantari aur Chyawanrishi ke parampara mei ‘unique’ Chyawanprash kaise bana payenge?”
Dabur additionally took concern with particular remarks in Patanjali’s ads that labeled a 40-herb Chyawanprash as “bizarre.”
This was interpreted as a direct jab at Dabur’s product, which claims to make use of “40+ herbs” and instructions over 60% of the Chyawanprash market share.
Dabur argued that these statements constituted three varieties of disparagement: misrepresenting Patanjali’s personal formulation, questioning Dabur’s dedication to Ayurvedic traditions, and branding Dabur’s product as inferior.
Also Read: Dabur Moves To Delhi HC Against Patanjali for Disparaging Chyawanprash Ads
Dabur contended that such ads mislead customers and erode belief in a class of merchandise which can be topic to stringent regulatory requirements. They emphasised that Chyawanprash is classed as a standard Ayurvedic medication, regulated below the Medicine and Cosmetics Act, which requires compliance with established formulations primarily based on historical Ayurvedic texts.
Dabur notified the courtroom that, regardless of receiving summons, Patanjali Ayurved broadcasted 6,182 ads within the previous weeks.
Dabur claimed that these advertisements misleadingly asserted that Patanjali’s product contained over 51 herbs, when in truth it solely included 47.
The corporate argued that this constituted the dissemination of false data to customers.
Dabur India said throughout earlier hearings,
“They confer with us as bizarre. They make a market chief bizarre,”
Labeling different manufacturers as bizarre will not be solely deceptive but additionally damaging, in line with Dabur.
The corporate instructions a 61.6% share of the Chyawanprash market.
Moreover, Dabur raised issues that the commercial implies well being dangers related to utilizing non-Patanjali merchandise, which raises public questions of safety.
They referenced earlier Supreme Courtroom rulings in contempt circumstances in opposition to Patanjali for related promoting practices, arguing that the corporate has a historical past of such habits.
Also Read: Kerala Court Issues Arrest Warrant Against Baba Ramdev For Misleading Patanjali Ads
The courtroom has quickly stayed Patanjali from persevering with its marketing campaign.
Dabur was represented by Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi, together with advocates R Jawahar Lal, Anirudh Bakhru, and Meghna Kumar.
Patanjali was defended by Senior Advocates Rajiv Nayar and Jayant Mehta, together with advocates Rohit Gandhi, Simranjeet Singh, Saurabh Seth, Neha Gupta, Rishabh Pant, Yajat Gulia, and Tina Aneja.
Case Title: Dabur India Restricted v. Patanjali Ayurved
