“External Forces Blocking Collegium Picks Must Be Dealt With Sternly”: Justice Dipankar Datta
Thanks for studying this submit, do not forget to subscribe!
Justice Dipankar Datta urges strict motion in opposition to exterior influences delaying judicial appointments and requires a clear, merit-based system.
Nagpur: On 28 June, Supreme Courtroom choose Justice Dipankar Datta, whereas talking at a felicitation occasion organized by the Bombay Excessive Courtroom Bar Affiliation (Nagpur Bench) in honour of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, made necessary remarks relating to the appointment of judges in India.
He raised considerations over the delay in performing upon suggestions made by the Supreme Courtroom Collegium and identified that such delays are sometimes brought on by “exterior forces,” which should be addressed significantly.
Justice Datta additionally emphasised the necessity for transparency and equity within the judicial appointments course of.
Throughout his speech, Justice Datta made a powerful assertion, saying,
“the exterior forces which forestall the Collegium’s suggestions from being acted upon ought to be handled sternly.”
He additional burdened that if the system of judges appointing judges is to proceed, then the suggestions made by the Collegium have to be revered and acted upon promptly.
He mentioned,
“That doesn’t occur. I recall once I was a member of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom Collegium in 2019, we had really helpful a member of the bar six years. Nothing has been accomplished. He’s now 58 or 59… Why does this occur? Has anyone questioned? So due to this fact, the exterior forces which forestall the Collegium’s suggestions from being acted upon ought to be handled sternly and I really feel that no matter proceedings are pending ought to be given high precedence to make sure that benefit, benefit and solely benefit is taken into account and never extraneous concerns.”
Justice Datta underlined the significance of creating the judicial appointment course of extra honest and open. He mentioned that whereas folks typically criticize the Collegium system—the place judges are concerned in appointing different judges—it is usually essential to take a look at the failings that existed earlier than the Collegium system got here into place.
In a direct attraction to CJI Gavai, he mentioned,
“Sir, that is an attraction to you. It’s excessive time that we dispense the misconceived notion that judges appoints judges. Critics of the collegium system have been vociferous – why ought to there be a collegium system?”
Justice Datta mirrored on the time earlier than the Collegium system was established and spoke about how even earlier than this method, deserving senior judges had been ignored for appointments to the Supreme Courtroom. Referring to such cases from the Eighties, he acknowledged,
“Let me return to the Eighties of the final century and recall 3 Chief Justices of Bombay Excessive Courtroom. Chief Justice MN Chandurkar, Chief Justice Chittatosh Mookerjee and Chief Justice PD Desai. Those that have practiced earlier than these three Justices and others would vouch that there have been a minimum of the judges who made it to the Supreme Courtroom within the Eighties.”
He then questioned why these extremely revered judges weren’t elevated, despite the fact that they had been thought-about equal in benefit to those that did make it to the Supreme Courtroom, saying,
ALSO READ: JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
“Does anyone query the pre-collegial system of appointment of judges? We solely consult with the supersession of the three judges by a choose in 1974. Simply previous to the Kesavananda Bharati judgment after which the supersession of Justice Khanna by the subsequent senior Supreme Courtroom Choose. However why doesn’t anyone query why didn’t Justice Chandurkar, Chief Justice Mookerjee and Chief Justice Desai didn’t make it?”
Click Here to Read Our Reports on JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
