Failure To Issue Genuine Temporary Registration No., Kupwara District Consumer Commission Holds Fairdeal Motors Liable
The Baramulla District Shopper Disputes Redressal Fee bench comprising Peerzada Hussain, President and Nyla Yaseen, Member has held Fairdeal Motors chargeable for indulging in unfair commerce follow and placing further monetary burden on the complainant by offering pretend non permanent Registration No to the automobile he bought.
Info of the Case:
The complainant bought a Tata Tiago automotive from Fairdeal motors and workshop ( Reverse celebration) by submitting all of the paperwork and required price for issuance of non permanent Registration No. Fairdeal motors issued non permanent Registration No. of the automobile. Consequently, the complainant approached the RTO with the stated non permanent Registration No. for registration of the automobile. The stated non permanent Registration No. afterward proved to be pretend and never real. The complainant then approached the other celebration with the request to problem correct non permanent Registration No. of the automobile however the identical was not issued.
In the mean time, the motorized vehicle guidelines have been modified by advantage of which the proprietor of the automobile needed to pay registration price @9% of the worth of the bought automobile. The complainant in accordance with the brand new guidelines deposited an quantity of Rs.37,878/-. He suffered the loss as a result of negligence of the other celebration as they didn’t problem real non permanent Registration No. on the time of buy of the automobile.
Thereafter the complainant approached the other celebration for a refund. The Reverse celebration didn’t pay again the cash , feeling aggrieved the complainant issued authorized discover. Since there was no reply from the Reverse celebration, the complainant approached Kupwara district Fee
Fairdeal motors failed to look and contest the case on receipt of discover and it was proceeded Ex-parte .
Statement by the Fee
The fee noticed that failure to problem real non permanent certificates to the customer and issuing pretend non permanent Registration No. is violation of the prescribed guidelines and rules, which quantities to unfair commerce follow.
By permitting the attraction, the Fee directed Honest deal to refund the surplus quantity of Rs.37,878/- deposited by the complainant on account of registration price. The Fee additional directed the other celebration to pay an quantity of Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation and Rs.10,000/- as litigation costs. The Fee additional directed the other celebration to make sure that such incidents don’t recur sooner or later.
