Kerala High Court Says “Over My Dead Body” To CPIM Leader For Facebook Post To “Pressurise” Court When Judgment Is Reserved
Thanks for studying this put up, remember to subscribe!
Kerala Excessive Court docket will provoke suo moto prison contempt in opposition to CPIM chief R. Rajesh for a Fb put up aimed toward pressurising the courtroom. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh stated, “Solely over my lifeless physique, he can put strain.”
Kochi: At this time, on July 7, Kerala Excessive Court docket Choose, Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh, on Monday made robust remarks in open courtroom in opposition to CPIM chief and former MLA R. Rajesh for posting a Fb message that allegedly tried to affect the judiciary.
The Court docket introduced that it’s going to take suo moto (by itself) prison contempt motion in opposition to the politician for the put up, which was made whereas a judgment in a case involving him was pending.
R. Rajesh, who can also be a member of the Syndicate of Kerala College, had filed a Writ Petition difficult the suspension of the College’s Registrar.
The petition was being heard by Justice Singh, who had already reserved judgment within the case.
Throughout the listening to of the matter, it got here to mild that Rajesh had posted a controversial message on Fb, which the Choose felt was a direct try to pressurize the Court docket.
The Bench, visibly upset, famous that the put up had tarnished the fame of the Choose and the judicial establishment as a complete. Justice Singh didn’t maintain again his phrases and addressed the difficulty strongly within the courtroom.
He stated:
“It’s not fame which is constructed over a day. He desires to place strain as a result of his judgment is reserved! Have you ever seen that Fb put up? Please go and see. It’s broadly circulated all over the place. I’m not deterred by anybody. I’m not a kind of who will be put below strain. I’ve not turn into a Choose to be cowed down and to be pressurised. Inform him that, solely over my lifeless physique, he can put strain.”
These remarks have been made in the course of the listening to of the Registrar’s Writ Petition, which was finally withdrawn by the Registrar himself, stating that the suspension had now been reviewed by the College Syndicate.
Justice Singh then sharply criticised Rajesh’s conduct, stating that as a litigant in the identical courtroom, Rajesh had no enterprise making public feedback aimed on the presiding Choose. He stated:
“An individual who’s a litigant earlier than me, he has written a Fb put up. He considers himself above the legislation.”
Additional including:
“Your shopper is a litigant earlier than the Court docket and his Writ Petition has been reserved for Judgment. He has the heart to write down a Fb put up in opposition to me. He can’t get away with this. I’m framing suo moto expenses for prison contempt.”
Justice Singh emphasised how such conduct lowers the dignity of the judiciary, saying:
“The social media put up besmirches the fame of the Choose, reducing the status of the establishment.”
He expressed his deep frustration over the timing and nature of the put up:
“When he’s a litigant, when his judgment has been reserved, he desires to affect the Choose! He desires to place strain on me. Inform him that over my grave solely, he can put strain on me. Top of every part on this Court docket.”
The Choose continued in robust phrases, indicating the seriousness of the difficulty:
“How can he write when Judgment is reserved? He’s a litigant, his judgment is reserved and he has written a stinking Fb put up, besmirching my fame. I’m placing you on discover. I’m taking suo moto cognizance of the put up and I’m framing expenses. By night the order shall be uploaded. When Judgment is reserved, any individual writing a Fb put up alleging malice in opposition to a Choose.”
In keeping with stories, the Fb put up in query allegedly accused the judiciary of “saffronisation,” a politically charged allegation that Justice Singh discovered unacceptable, particularly coming from somebody immediately concerned in a pending case.
ALSO READ: Suo Moto Cases At An All-Time High: Supreme Court Review 2024
Justice Singh’s feedback make it clear that he views the put up as not simply disrespectful, but in addition a direct assault on the judicial system and the integrity of the Bench.
The Kerala Excessive Court docket is now anticipated to add the order by night, formally initiating suo moto prison contempt proceedings in opposition to R. Rajesh.
The discover in query was issued after the occasion had already begun, with the Kerala Governor—who additionally serves because the Chancellor of the College—current on stage. This motion was perceived as an act of disrespect in direction of the Governor.
Following the incident, Dr. Kumar was suspended by the appearing Vice Chancellor. In response, Dr. Kumar approached the Kerala Excessive Court docket to contest his suspension. He argued that the discover was issued with the intention of stopping any potential pupil unrest associated to the show of a non secular {photograph} on the venue.
Dr. Kumar additionally asserted that the cancellation discover was issued earlier than the Governor arrived on the venue for the occasion.
Regardless of objections from the appearing Vice Chancellor, Dr. Kumar was reinstated by the College Syndicate on Sunday, July 6.
Senior Advocate Elvin Peter PJ appeared on behalf of Dr. Kumar, whereas Kerala College was represented by its standing counsel, Thomas Abraham.
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Suo Moto
