The Punjab & Haryana High Court Senior Advocates Association on Thursday (May 29) felicitated Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Anil Kshetarpal on their recent proposed transfers recommeded by the Supreme Court collegium. Justices Sharma and Kshetarpal were recently recommended for transfer by the Supreme Court Collegium. Justice Sharma has recommended to be transferred to…

The Supreme Court held that the Complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) qualifies as a victim and has a right to file an Appeal without seeking special leave. The Court held thus in Criminal Appeals filed against the common Judgment of the Madras High Court. The two-Judge Bench comprising…

NOMINAL INDEX S. Sai Priya and others v. Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 168 K V Venugopal v. Secretary to Government of TN, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 169 V Iyyappan v. The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 170 Sivakumar v. State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 171 A Paramasivam and Another v. The Inspector of…

Thank you for reading this post, don’t forget to subscribe! Karnataka Governor Gehlot sends Muslim reservation bill to the President, citing constitutional concerns. He uses the same Supreme Court judgment the state cited to justify the move. Karnataka Governor Refers Muslim Reservation Bill to President, Citing Supreme Court Judgment Bengaluru: Today, On May 28, Karnataka…

The Delhi High Court declared the ‘RITZ’ and ‘RITZ-CARLTON’ marks as well-known trademarks within the meaning of Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trademarks Act. The Court granted a decree of permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them from infringing the trademarks ‘RITZ’ and ‘RITZ-CARLTON’, as also their variants and formative marks, including ‘RITZ INN’ and ‘RITZ…

In an interview given to the media today, Justice KT Thomas, a retired judge of the Supreme Court, said that Indira Gandhi tried to destroy the democracy of India by imposing emergency. He also praised the government for Operation Sindoor. When asked about his opinion about Indira Gandhi, Justice Thomas said, “Not only am I…

The Delhi High Court held that gratuity which is payable to a deceased employee is liable to be attached against a decree for recovery of money passed against the heirs of the said employee. The Court dismissed a Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution by the Petitioner challenging the order of the Trial…

The Supreme Court today continued hearing the batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Arguing on behalf of the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the legislation and denied allegations that the amendments facilitate the takeover of private properties by Waqf Boards, and that waqf by user is not…

Ordering the closure of a TASMAC shop situated on a public road, the Madras High Court recently observed that a welfare government should strive to enforce prohibition rather than establishing more TASMAC shops, which affects the public health. “Therefore, it is a constitutional philosophy and the Directive principles insist that a welfare Government should strive…