Ramdev Vs State | “Digital Crimes Of Sharing Indecent/Nude Pictures Can Destroy Lives”: Allahabad HC Refuses Bail In WhatsApp Case
The Allahabad Excessive Courtroom denied bail to a person named Ramdev accused of sharing indecent photos of a lady on WhatsApp. The Courtroom emphasised how social media crimes can destroy lives and referred to as for a speedy trial.
Thanks for studying this publish, do not forget to subscribe!
UTTAR PRADESH: In a powerful message towards the misuse of digital expertise, the Allahabad Excessive Courtroom expressed deep concern in regards to the critical injury attributable to on-line crimes, particularly when personal and indecent photos of people are shared on social media platforms.
This commentary got here in the course of the listening to of a case titled Ramdev v. State of UP, the place the Courtroom firmly refused to grant bail to the accused man.
The matter was heard by Justice Ajay Bhanot, who underlined how modern-day crimes are evolving with expertise.
The choose said:
“Digital expertise is altering the face of crime. Indecent footage of an individual when circulated on public platforms by social media can destroy lives. That is the laborious social actuality.”
The accused on this case was arrested in January 2025, after allegedly circulating a lady’s personal photos through WhatsApp. He had filed a bail software within the Excessive Courtroom after a decrease court docket rejected his plea in April 2025.
Nonetheless, the Excessive Courtroom refused to offer him bail. The Courtroom took notice that some photos have been discovered with the accused and that these photos have been but to bear forensic testing. This proof pointed to the accused’s potential involvement within the critical offence below the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Part 67A of the Data Expertise Act, 2000.
The Courtroom made it clear:
“The FSL report is awaited. The offence is grave. There may be probability that the applicant had dedicated the offence. At this stage, no case for bail is made out.”
Whereas rejecting the bail, the Courtroom additionally made positive to stability justice. It pressured that the trial must be accomplished rapidly, with out pointless delay. It ordered the decrease court docket to hold out all essential steps below the legislation to ensure witnesses are current and the case strikes ahead effectively.
The Courtroom additional famous:
“The trial court docket has additionally to take heed to the rights of the accused individuals and is below obligation of legislation to make sure that all expeditious, essential and coercive measures as per legislation are adopted to make sure the presence of witnesses. Counsels or events who delay or impede the proceedings shouldn’t solely be discouraged from doing so however in applicable circumstances exemplary prices must also be imposed on such events/ counsel.”
It additionally reminded the authorities that earlier instructions had already been issued to ensure that summons to accused and witnesses are correctly served. The Courtroom expressed concern over delays as a result of attorneys’ strikes and requested all involved to observe the foundations in order that trials don’t get delayed.
To additional guarantee velocity within the case, the Excessive Courtroom directed the District Choose to maintain a detailed watch on the case’s progress:
“The discovered District Choose is directed to take weekly studies of the progress of the trial … With out going into the deserves of the case, the bail software is dismissed … The trial choose shall submit a fortnightly report on the progress of trial and the steps taken to adjust to this order to the discovered District Choose.”
On this matter, Advocates Satyam Mishra and Shailendra Singh represented the accused.
CASE TITLE:
Ramdev v. State of UP.
Would You Like Assistance In Drafting A Legal Notice Or Complaint?
CLICK HERE
Click Here to Read Our Reports on Nude Pictures
Click Here to Read Our Reports on Digital Crimes
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
