Supreme Court Is Not Just A CJI’s Court. Justices UU Lalit, Sanjiv Khanna And I Have Attempted To Dispel This Notion

CJI BR Gavai strongly addressed the assumption that the Supreme Courtroom is managed solely by the Chief Justice, emphasizing collective decision-making and judicial steadiness. He highlighted key reforms, private values, and transparency in appointments and pensions.

Thanks for studying this put up, remember to subscribe!

Maharashtra: Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai gave a robust and emotional speech on the Excessive Courtroom Bar Affiliation in Nagpur, the place he overtly talked about many points together with teamwork contained in the Supreme Courtroom, the bounds of judicial activism, transparency in decide appointments, and private reminiscences of his journey in regulation.

He particularly responded to a typical perception that the Supreme Courtroom is run solely by the Chief Justice, and never by all of the judges collectively.

“There’s a rising perception that Supreme Courtroom is a CJ’s court docket and never a court docket of all judges. However Justices UU Lalit, Sanjiv Khanna and I’ve tried to dispel that notion.”

He defined how he and his predecessors, Justice UU Lalit and Justice Sanjiv Khanna, made particular efforts to advertise team-based choices.

ALSO READ: “Restore J&K Statehood Now”: 5 Petitioners Urge CJI Gavai in Open Letter

Gavai stated that full court docket conferences have been held as quickly as they took cost, and everybody’s opinion was revered earlier than making choices.

“Instantly after Justice Lalit took over as CJI, he had full court docket assembly on the very subsequent day. I additionally held a full court docket assembly instantly on the following day of assuming the workplace. We took all the selections by considering views of everybody,”

-he stated.

CJI Gavai additionally spoke about judicial activism, saying that the courts should step in when the federal government or legislature fails to guard residents’ rights. Nevertheless, he warned that the judiciary shouldn’t transcend its function.

“I all the time felt the judicial activism was essential as a result of at any time when the chief or the legislature failed, the judiciary needed to step in in order to behave as custodian of the rights of the residents. However I all the time additionally really feel that every one the three wings ought to work inside the spheres allotted to them. And although judicial activism is right here to remain, it ought to by no means flip into judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism. I nonetheless imagine in the identical precept,”

-he stated.

He additionally shared an emotional second from his formative years, the place he gave credit score to his dad and mom, particularly his mom’s arduous work, for his success in regulation regardless of coming from a modest background.

ALSO READ: Not the Master, Just ‘First Among Equals’: CJI Gavai on Role of Chief Justice

“I adopted my father’s resolution to change into a lawyer. It’s my mom’s arduous work. Although we had a humble background… It’s this worth of inclusiveness that has formed my future life,”

-he expressed.

Whereas talking about his work on the Public Curiosity Litigation (PIL) bench, CJI Gavai proudly recalled how he helped enhance the security of the Nagpur-Jabalpur freeway, which had seen many accidents earlier.

“I used to be comfortable to see to it that the Nagpur Jabalpur Freeway, which was languishing for years collectively and had witnessed greater than 100 deaths as a result of accidents was accomplished. We for the primary adopted the mannequin of sustainable growth and whereas making certain that the freeway is constructed additionally ensured that the ecology and curiosity of the wildlife is maintained by offering for lengthy subways in order that the animals travelling from one a part of the jungle to a different a part of the jungle discover that they’re travelling in the identical jungle.”

As Chief Justice, one in every of his most necessary choices was about giving higher pensions to retired judges.

He was shocked to be taught concerning the very low pensions some judges have been getting.

“I utilized the precept of 1 rank, one pension. A number of the judges have been residing in penury. I used to be aghast once I got here to know {that a} retired decide of some Excessive Courtroom was getting a pension of ₹7k to 8k,”

-he said.

Concerning the appointment of judges, he defined that the Supreme Courtroom’s collegium is making critical efforts to maintain the method clear and truthful.

ALSO READ: “Identifying Creamy Layer in SC/ST Was My Path-Breaking Ruling”: CJI Bhushan Gavai

“I believe we’re following transparency. We attempt to preserve seniority and advantage within the issues of choice and Justice Chandurkar is a residing instance of that.”

The occasion noticed the presence of many dignitaries and senior members of the judiciary, together with former Chief Justice UU Lalit, Supreme Courtroom Justices Dipankar Datta, Prasanna B Varale, and Atul S Chandurkar, Chief Justice of Bombay Excessive Courtroom Alok Aradhe, Bombay Excessive Courtroom Justices Anil S Kilor and Nitin W Sambre, Solicitor Basic Tushar Mehta, and Maharashtra Advocate Basic Dr. Birendra Saraf.

Would You Like Assistance In Drafting A Legal Notice Or Complaint?

CLICK HERE

Click Here to Read Our Reports on CJI BR Gavai

Click Here to Read Our Reports on Ex-CJI Sanjiv Khanna

FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES