Supreme Court to hear HDFC Bank CEO plea seeking quashing of FIR on Friday

The Supreme Courtroom will hear on Friday, a petition filed by HDFC Financial institution CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan, searching for to quash the FIR registered towards him on the behest of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Belief.

The Bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice Okay Vinod Chandran agreed to record the matter tomorrow.

Showing for Jagdishan, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi sought pressing itemizing of the plea on the grounds that three Bombay Excessive Courtroom judges had recused from listening to the matter, inflicting a delay in itemizing.

Rohatgi contended {that a} frivolous FIR had been lodged towards the HDFC Financial institution and it’s MD by trustees of the Lilavati hospital, who had been litigating towards the opposite group of trustees. The financial institution needed to recuperate cash from them. With the intention to twist the arm, they lodged an FIR by way of the Justice of the Peace towards the MD.

The Senior Counsel apprised the Apex Courtroom that Jagdishan had earlier approached the Excessive Courtroom. After three Benches of the Excessive Courtroom recused from listening to, the matter was tentatively listed for listening to on July 14. The financial institution was struggling every day because of the case, he added.

As per the FIR, Jagdishan had accepted a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore from erstwhile Trustee Chetan Mehta, for giving him monetary recommendation and serving to him to retain management over the Belief’s governance. Jagdishan additionally interfered with the interior issues by misusing his place as the pinnacle of the HDFC Financial institution.

The petition filed by Jagdishan was initially listed for listening to earlier than the Division Bench of Justice Ajay Gadkari and Justice Rajesh Patil of the Excessive Courtroom on June 18. Nevertheless, Justice Patil cited some private issue and recused from listening to the matter.

Jagdishan’s authorized crew, led by Senior Counsel Amit Desai, subsequently talked about his petition earlier than the Bench of Justice Sarang Kotwal and Justice Shyam Chandak. Nevertheless, Justice Kotwal recused.

The matter was later listed earlier than a Division Bench of Justice Mahesh Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain. Justice Jain, who disclosed that he had shares within the HDFC financial institution, recused after an objection was raised towards him listening to the case.

As per an earlier administrative order of the Excessive Courtroom, instances associated to the Lilavati Belief had been to not be listed earlier than six different judges of the Excessive Courtroom.

Supreme Courtroom to listen to HDFC Financial institution CEO plea searching for quashing of FIR on Friday

The Supreme Courtroom will hear on Friday, a petition filed by HDFC Financial institution CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan, searching for to quash the FIR registered towards him on the behest of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Belief.

The Bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice Okay Vinod Chandran agreed to record the matter tomorrow.

Showing for Jagdishan, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi sought pressing itemizing of the plea on the grounds that three Bombay Excessive Courtroom judges had recused from listening to the matter, inflicting a delay in itemizing.

Rohatgi contended {that a} frivolous FIR had been lodged towards the HDFC Financial institution and it’s MD by trustees of the Lilavati hospital, who had been litigating towards the opposite group of trustees. The financial institution needed to recuperate cash from them. With the intention to twist the arm, they lodged an FIR by way of the Justice of the Peace towards the MD.

The Senior Counsel apprised the Apex Courtroom that Jagdishan had earlier approached the Excessive Courtroom. After three Benches of the Excessive Courtroom recused from listening to, the matter was tentatively listed for listening to on July 14. The financial institution was struggling every day because of the case, he added.

As per the FIR, Jagdishan had accepted a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore from erstwhile Trustee Chetan Mehta, for giving him monetary recommendation and serving to him to retain management over the Belief’s governance. Jagdishan additionally interfered with the interior issues by misusing his place as the pinnacle of the HDFC Financial institution.

The petition filed by Jagdishan was initially listed for listening to earlier than the Division Bench of Justice Ajay Gadkari and Justice Rajesh Patil of the Excessive Courtroom on June 18. Nevertheless, Justice Patil cited some private issue and recused from listening to the matter.

Jagdishan’s authorized crew, led by Senior Counsel Amit Desai, subsequently talked about his petition earlier than the Bench of Justice Sarang Kotwal and Justice Shyam Chandak. Nevertheless, Justice Kotwal recused.

The matter was later listed earlier than a Division Bench of Justice Mahesh Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain. Justice Jain, who disclosed that he had shares within the HDFC financial institution, recused after an objection was raised towards him listening to the case.

As per an earlier administrative order of the Excessive Courtroom, instances associated to the Lilavati Belief had been to not be listed earlier than six different judges of the Excessive Courtroom.