Expert Legal Guidance, Strategic Business Success – Your Trusted Partner in Law & Compliance
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Daivshala & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr., Civil Appeal Numbers 6986 of 2015 decided on 28.07.2025, enforced that an accident occurring to an employee while commuting from his residence to the place of employment or vice versa, is covered under the Employees’…
The Delhi High Court has held that the ‘three months’ period prior to expiry of three years within which show cause notice for alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit must be issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act, means three calendar months and not 90 days. Under Section 73, SCN is issued to…
Aditya Infotech IPO Listing Khaitan & Co has advised video security and surveillance company Aditya Infotech and its promoter selling shareholders on its initial public offering comprising a fresh issue of INR 500 crore and an offer for sale worth INR 800 crore. Trilegal and Hogan Lovells served as domestic and international counsel, respectively, to…
Thank you for reading this post, don’t forget to subscribe! Supreme Court dismissed GUVNL’s appeal, ruling it must follow public policy, not just profits. SC upheld GERC and APTEL’s orders on fair wind energy tariffs. Supreme Court Slams Gujarat Power Body: ‘Can’t Act Like Private Entity’, Rejects GUVNL Pleas on Wind Energy Tariff New Delhi:…
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Daivshala & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr., Civil Appeal Numbers 6986 of 2015 decided on 28.07.2025, enforced that an accident occurring to an employee while commuting from his residence to the place of employment or vice versa, is covered under the Employees’…
The Delhi High Court has held that consolidated show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST is not only permissible but necessary, to unearth wrongful availment of ITC over a span of period. A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta observed, “The nature of ITC is such that fraudulent…
The Delhi High Court has held that there is no bar on the invocation of Section 104A of the Patent Act 1970 at the initial stage of a suit, when the patent holder seeks disclosure of the defendant’s process. For context, Section 104A prescribes that where the subject matter of a patent infringement suit is…
The Kerala High Court observed that unless the foreign country where a power of attorney was executed before a notary public is a reciprocating country by way of recognition under Section 14 of the Notaries Act, the notarial act done in the foreign country lacks sanctity. Thus, an Indian Court cannot unilaterally recognize a notarial…
The Supreme Court in its recent Judgment, observed that the settlements entered under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (IDA) are not administrative conveniences. The Court observed thus in a Civil Appeal preferred against the Judgment of the Telangana High Court, which allowed the Writ Appeal of the Telangana State Road Transport Corporation…
The Supreme Court asked the Power Ministry to work with top regulators and create a clear plan to cut emissions from coal-based power plants. The Court warned that delays could worsen Delhi’s already dangerous air pollution. Thank you for reading this post, don’t forget to subscribe! NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on July 22, 2025asked…
