Expert Legal Guidance, Strategic Business Success – Your Trusted Partner in Law & Compliance
The Supreme Court has referred the issue concerning the liability of the insurer in a claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 qua the owner/insured to a Larger Bench. The Apex Court noted that the non-obstante clause of Section 163A is in suppression of the entire Act, the other laws in force…
Highlighting the fact that it is both just and necessary to absolve the insurer from liability, making the driver and/or owner solely responsible for paying compensation in drunk driving cases, the Karnataka High Court has asked the Central and State Governments to consider the same and make necessary amendments in the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988…
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom noticed merely as a result of an accident occurred, shouldn’t be ipso facto a floor to attribute negligence to the motive force within the absence of any such proof. The Prison Attraction was filed by the Prosecution towards the order of acquittal of the trial court docket in a rash/negligent driving…
